It took HOW many pages to get that through your thick skull?
AnimeGalleries [dot] Net | AnimeWallpapers [dot] Com | AnimeLyrics [dot] Com | AnimePedia [dot] Com | AnimeGlobe [dot] Com |
It took HOW many pages to get that through your thick skull?
Lame show is lame, just SFAGUFGYFGUOISFGVFOLFGBVHIKFVASDFUOGFIOQEÖGVBFHILV OFAVOÖBAE Ignore it, will you? If you have a opinion, do research, read it up enough, see what others think and just GTFO this site if you are gonna continue this way, and let us go back to peace.
Heeey!
Set made by me
"Do you know who I am? I'm the man who's going to burn your house down! With the lemons! I'm going to get my engineers to invent a combustible lemon that burns your house down!"
Yes but I don't do it in front of an open window where anybody could see me sitting naked in the tub. That's something called MODESTY or DECENCY! This scene is at the VERY LEAST an "indecent" scene (if not worse, as the character is underage) due to the fact a character appearing like this is the anime equivalent of a person in real life sitting in front of an open window where anybody could see them naked in the tub.
But these aren't babies. They look like 5 or 6 yo (even though technically they are much older). Only the SICKEST of pedos would even go for a baby. But it's NOT uncommon to hear about a pedophile going after a 6yo. And for this reason 6yo do NOT appear naked in TV commercials for ANY clothing advertisement. Shows like this Lucky Sstar, ESPECIALLY the scene in question, simply strengthen the sick urges REAL pedos have when they watch the show, and drive them to attack MORE children in real life. Such kidnappings and rapes often end in death as the perv kills the child to hide the evidence. Think how many children IN REAL LIFE might have been spared rape and even murder if that one scene had been left out of this anime! Think of the number of real life pedos might have watched that show, and because of that SPECIFIC SCENE, might have been emboldened to attack more children IN REAL LIFE! Even if for every 100 child rapes and murders, only one of them was because a pedo saw this scene in this anime, if that scene was removed and that one child's life was spared it would be SO important. The wellbeing of even ONE child is priceless, it has a value that can NEVER be expressed with money. That one child's life being spared would also mean sparing the child's parents an impossible to imagine amount of grief and sorrow. Do I think removal of that scene would be a good idea, even it only spared the life of 1 out of 100 children who would possibly be targeted by pedos? Heck yes! We as a society need to PROTECT our children, even if it makes some anime fans and otakus cry out that the edit was "unnecessary" or "stupid" or claim that the scene wasn't actually a bad scene.
Ok that pic wasn't even costplay you FOOL! And you seriously need to lay off the hentai. Now for the Lucky Star scene being mentioned: IT'S NOT PORN YOU IMBECILE! It's meant to be cute for an anime for kids. Nothing was shown moron! If you don't like it, DON'T WATCH IT AND SHUT UP ABOUT IT!!! And this is all coming from a stupid perv who jacks of to pictures of clothed women and hentai, yet says any anime is "dirty". Where were you when they were handing out the brains? What's next dumdum? What crazy bullcrap you got in your head now?
---------- Post added at 01:51 AM ---------- Previous post was at 01:46 AM ----------
Exactly. And it's too late for the negative rep thing. People already started to do that. Somebody should just kick this pedo-perv off right now. where's the ban hammer when you need it?
Last edited by Token Black Guy; 11-15-2010 at 12:57 AM.
Man that is whack!
Token Black Guy
But it's still CP. You KNOW she's naked if she's taking a bath.
And that makes whoever the viewer is into a pervert automatically (in other words YOU'D HAVE TO BE A PERV TO EVEN WATCH THIS SCENE, which is why if I had a copy of Lucky Star on video tape or DVD I'd fast-forward by that scene, because I'm NOT a perv, and if on the computer, I'd delete this scene using Windows Movie Maker). You see here the problem is in fact because the scene IS how you described the scene. It simulates being in the room with a NAKED CHILD IN A BATHTUB! IF YOU CAN DEFEND THIS SCENE, THEN YOU ARE A PEDOPHILE!!!!!
Last edited by Videogamer555; 11-15-2010 at 12:59 AM.
Really, we're back to arguing that that scene is child porn? Go back to my Dexter posts. I already disproved this. This just shows that you're an idiot and need to just shut up. At this point there's no way the community as a whole will accept you. And you only have yourself to blame for alienating us.
I'm just gonna throw this out there but you do realize that 5 or 6 year olds don't have giant eyes and every hair color of the rainbow. A person doesn't go after a child because of a show with far unrealistic people, they are more likely to go after a kid because of a disney show. Now tell me because of that should we just take away every kid on TV to be sure that people don't get the wrong ideas? Try to think on how many people are actually gonna go out and kidnap somebody because they want some kid with poolball sized eyes and a head that is almost a quarter the size of their body. come back when you have a valid complaint please.
Set made by me
"Do you know who I am? I'm the man who's going to burn your house down! With the lemons! I'm going to get my engineers to invent a combustible lemon that burns your house down!"
Videogamer, enjoy your neg rep, as I almost never give that out.
Yeah, this thread stopped being funny pages ago. In fact, it's actually starting to stink.
that is all. Good day.
The Brighter the Light the Darker the Shadow
That's because there's NOTHING WRONG with the scene. It's not child porn. It's not child porn because there's NOTHING WRONG with the scene.
No dude. Your just plain "Insane in the membrane". And saying somebody who likes Lucky star is a pervert is like saying somebody who likes the Video games Mortal Kombat, Duke Nukem, Doom, and Halo a homicidal psycho-killer, or like calling a Dragonball Z fan a vionent person. Your just saying negative stuff about something you don't understand.
Man that is whack!
Token Black Guy
Wanna know why this scene should be deleted? The same reason that under the Bush administration, Congress twice passed laws (both later struck down by the Supreme Court for being unconstitional) which banned lolis from being in hentai. And the same reason that during the short time one of those laws were in effect, someone was arrested for having a loli hentai manga in his manga collection. He's still in prison as of today serving his like 20 year sentence and his lifetime entry to the sex offender registry, even though the Supreme Court struck down these laws, because their Supreme Court decision wasn't retroactive and so did not overturn the convictions of those convicted under those laws. And you know what? If those laws had stayed in place, the child rape and child murder statistics would probably show a DRAMATIC drop in these crimes. By that same reasoning, I think the Lucky Star scene in question should be deleted from the master copy of the anime back at that anime studio that made it. If it was, the United States and Japan (and any other country that Lucky Star has seen DVD releases in) would be A LOT safer for kids. As it would DRAMATICALLY cut down on child sex crimes in those countries.
Last edited by Videogamer555; 11-15-2010 at 01:24 AM.
I give, anyone else want to try bashing something into this guy's head?
I grow tired of this argument. I'm gonna go check out some other threads on here and see if I can have a reasonable discussion on something I don't find controversial.
Not just yet I'm still not completely bored with disassembling his arguments, but hey save me a club and a spot.
Have you ever thought on the other side of that argument, i'm not saying i agree with CP because god do i hate it, but some of those people are hulled back by using drawn images, would you rather take that away and make their only choice to go after real kids, i don't know about you but if i had to choose I'd take the lesser of two evils and pick the obvious one. as you said even one child's life is precious right? As for the laws don't you think they got repealed for a reason i mean there was obviously something going on that you might not have realized.
Set made by me
"Do you know who I am? I'm the man who's going to burn your house down! With the lemons! I'm going to get my engineers to invent a combustible lemon that burns your house down!"
There are 2 types of pedos.
1: Those who are already pedos to the fullest extent. They'll offend no matter what they watch on TV. They may not even be away of the existence of anime in the first place, nor would it effect them for better or worse if they discovered it.
2: Those who have a tendency toward that, but aren't quite "over the edge" yet. Hentai with lolis in it (once they discover its existance) may push them over the edge, and will then attack REAL kids whether or not loli hentai is available to them as an "outlet" for their feelings.
Hentai should ONLY revolve around people 18 years or older or at ABSOLUTE WORST CASE SCENARIO 14 or older (I'm willing to go this far ONLY because anime is fantasy, and would NEVER say 14 for real life porn). But true loli hentai like with 8yos getting raped has NO PLACE IN ANIME AND SHOULD BE WIPED OFF THE EARTH! And as I said before, that Lucky Star scene I lump in with that, and I also lump in that Dexter's Lab scene as well.
Now as I said. I DON'T WANT TO ARGUE ANYMORE SO PLEASE STOP BRINGING UP CONTROVERSIAL TOPICS!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
I'd like to point out that there are porn vids based around women playing under age girls. Many of whom are barely 18. And you're only arguing to stop it since you've lost.
VG555, you already lost. Now just staple your talk hole!
Man that is whack!
Token Black Guy
If they are 18 it's legal (though my understanding of the law states that if one takes legal porn and passes it off as CP pretending the person is under 18, then that is actually ILLEGAL). That's not what I was worried about. It was about the nature of OBVIOUSLY VERY YOUNG KIDS appearing to be bathing in said anime.
Now as I said before I'm TIRED OF ARGUING SO STOP POSTING COMEBACKS, and someone LOCK THIS THREAD ALREADY!!!!!
Well let me put it this way, the voice actress for the hentai is over 18. There's no difference in this regard. There's no difference in a drawing or an a women who looks like she's 16. You could just as easily replace the drawing with a women and it'd make no difference.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Bookmarks