AnimeGalleries [dot] Net | AnimeWallpapers [dot] Com | AnimeLyrics [dot] Com | AnimePedia [dot] Com | AnimeGlobe [dot] Com |
A bit simple and plain and it's hard to tell what the 'thing' is...
Yeah but he just looks covered not enough showing...
Honestly, I wouldnt go with the title of 'Expert' in this tag. I mean, I dont even go by it. Also, there isnt even much to go off of with this tag to begin with, its just one gradient, text, an extraction, and a border. Basically, less that 5 layers, which is considerably small when I think of a signature. You really need to look at more tutorials.
Try and be modest.
I kinda like the sig, though like Serated said, you should look at more tutorials.
like i said in the first post
im not trying to gloat or anything i just thought it fit well with the sig
i will gladly go with another one if it offends anyone (because obviously im not an expert)
Thats good, but wheres the actual pic?
O.o It can't just be background.
Oh wait, I just found it.
Well, maybe try putting in more color into the background.
It's just nets. -Iforgetwhattheywerecalled:\-
But uh, good use of C4Ds. Though it looks too graphically c4deed.
Last edited by UrusaiSevera; 04-06-2009 at 05:11 PM.
You've over used everything. From the wireframes to the c4d's. They're also badly placed. The main render is hardly noticable. Not to mention the fact that you can't tell what it is. The borders nice though.
It's good that your experimenting so, yeah not bad.
Forgive my straightforwardness/rudeness... it's how I hand out critisism.
Last edited by FinalReaper; 04-06-2009 at 07:58 AM.
First of all, kudos for using c4ds and nets on your second sig, it's good to try out different techniques whenever you can. Although they don't always work together.
For the focus of a sig try having your image in the centre and clearly visable, the rest should fit into the sig with it, without taking away that focus So, still use nets (maybe not as many) but try to get it so they flow with the signature and don't take away from the stock :3
But overall, it's good that you're using a range of techniques and are trying out ways to place them. Good job
I don't think you need an image for your signature.
This is unique.
New, something fresh for the signature world to see.
No offense to anyone, but the techniques people are trying to teach you make everyone's signatures look the same.
You're being different, yours looks nothing like any signature I have seen.
I love the abstraction of this.
I love have abstract it is.
And how the colors blend in with each other.
YOU ALREADY HAVE A GOOD TECHNIQUE AND SHOULD CONTINUE THIS UP.
BECAUSE THESE ARE A GREAT WAY OF LOOKING AT A SIGNATURE.
WITH A FRESH AND UNIQUE NEW VIEW.
GOOD WORK, KEEP IT UP AND I'LL BE ASKING FOR YOU TO MAKE ME SIGNATURES.
"There exist only three respectable beings: the priest, the warrior, the poet. To know, to kill, and to create."-Charles Baudelaire
Hmm... I find the sig to be a bit confusing, it does have an image of a person with a guitar (I can see it from it's shape.) But it seems... confusing like some sort of IQ test picture.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Bookmarks