yeah..I have some more information...I hope it isn´t boring. I got them from
www.tiermord.de that´s a german site. I am translating a few facts..
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Every hour 650000 animals are killed only in the USA. According to an official statistics (protection of animals report 2001 of the consumer ministry) were killed in Germany in 1998:
332.100.000 Fat chickens
40.200.000 Pigs
24.000.000 Soup chickens
20,300,000 turkeys
14,200,000 ducks
4,100,000 bovine animals
1,000,000 geese 900,000 sheep / nanny goats
17,500 horses
The Jewish author Isaac Singer Bashevis (1904-1991), said once: For the animals is every day Treblinka. Every compassionate person once a slaughter-house from the inside has seen will be shocked and forswear to meat food for good.
The life of a pig is from beginning up to his end an ordeal: It will never see in its whole life probably the sunlight, a respect with his congeners can build up, or may wallow lighthearted in the mud. In stead of that it´s usually locked up directly after the birth taken away by the mother and thus that it cannot already turn round after few months any more. So that the pig wins fast in weight, it is filled up with chemicals only in such a way which provide for it that it eats, although it has no hunger. Then already after few months it is driven in a slaughter-house in him be short and painful life on the most crude one is finished. It is done with electroshock therapies and slashes in the homicide space, nevertheless, shrinks back, because it the shouts of his congeners the neck hears to those before him is cut open.
The animals are tormented and ill-treated. If the people had to became eat no meat nobody starve!
Indeed, the meat consumption is a principal reason why even today people above all in the Third World in hunger must suffer and die. On gigantic plantations in the Third World cattle feed is grown instead of food for the vegetating away population often for the industrial nations. An easy arithmetic example shows that with this wasted food the humanity the hunger once and for all remove könnte:Auf 1 hectare of country könnenentweder 250 pounds of beef or 40,000 pounds of potatoes are planted.
Only in 1995 the World-Watch institute has calculated that one single hamburger would have to cost 350 dollars (today about 175 €)!
The institute calculated all environmental impacts with the meat production in the price., the clearing of rain forest to creation of pasture surfaces and the subsequent problems, for example, by the garbage one. All the same where you eat her hamburger or your chicken's club: They support in every snack, every butcher bar, in everybody Almost - Food store, the exploitation and destruction of sensitive living beings.
Some say:
Nevertheless, I alone can save no animals
counterargument:
O, nevertheless, this you are able! An example The typical American has eaten up to his 72nd year about 11 cows, 3 lambs and sheep, 23 pigs, 45 turkeys, 1100 chickens and 862 pounds of fish.
Argument: Nevertheless, animals also eat other animals!
Counterargument: You want to compare yourself with predators like lions and tigers? nevertheless, \"Unfortunately, \" we have with the apes common forefathers from, and gorillas are same not only to 97% in the DNA with us, but pure herbivores, so Veganer. We have no predatory teeth or claws to tear up our victims. Rather on the contrary, because our rectangular grinders are almost created for grinding by grain and other herbal food! Moreover, is proved academically that the intestinal length is very vital for digesting of certain food. Our relatively long bowel of a herbivore is as inexpedient for the digestion of quickly rotting meat like the short bowel of the tiger for the digestion of a fresh grain muesli. If one has a look what carnivorous animals consume as the first if they have made prey, stimulates not necessarily to us also to the mimicry: the full intestine with the predigested food leftovers of the prey animal. No one would eat this. Moreover, the animals hunt to themselves her meals themselves. Would you always eat cows yet when you had to look to her only in the eyes and hunt to her then the knife by the skin and while her death yelling the blood from the wound splashes? And domestic animals like pigs or bovine animals are made by people to cannibals if they get bone meal, etc. fed. (To be quiet completely from the feces to feeds, as for example in France uncovered).
Argument:
I do not kill the animals myself!
Counterargument:
Order murder is as bad. Hitler has never killed certainly anybody even with his own hands, but nobody doubts that he was one of the worst murderers of the world history. With her purchase of meat they give, so to speak, the order to kill another animal to fill in the shelve again.
Argument:
Nevertheless, the animals are killed briefly and painless.
Counterargument:
Why many cows with electroshock therapies must be done to the butchering when this procedure was painless? Do you think serious that animals feel no pain if they are killed? How do you explain to yourself then the death shouts? Should this be a Hallejuha? And even if the battle act should be relatively short what also not always is the case, still the death follows afterwards. If you could choose between short \"painless \" death and the life what you would take?
Argument: If we did not kill the cows and pigs, nevertheless, they would become to us too many.
Counterargument:
So stupidly this argument also sounds, some people still argue with it. However, they seem to forget that if nobody ate animals they would have to become not at all only \"grownly \". Moreover, cows give only milk if they are pregnant. If the milk turnover sank, the number would also sink immediately after the birth killed and to animal meal (for feed and gelatin) to processed animals.
In the ready, meat-containing dog food the animal parts are used as a rule which are useless for the person, speak the meat from ill from death, handicapped and before late animals or also ground Hühnerferdern. Whether this is the right food for the best friend of the person, I find extremely doubtfully...
One proves that domestic animals must on no account eat meat around a well-balanced food to receive. That is however on no account that the dog of your friend must live on artichokes and cherry tomatoes. There are various suppliers of vegetarian dog food. And even recently for the divas among the little animals and her owners there is a vegetarian cookbook...
Meat is meat - grief is grief - pain is pain - murder is a murder death is death.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
If there are some question. Ask^^ I am searching the answer if you want to.
Maybe I should say that I am a vegetarian for 5 years.