I would have to say about 20-30 of them depending on how close together they are when they come charging at me.
Printable View
I would have to say about 20-30 of them depending on how close together they are when they come charging at me.
I can only do 20. xD I hate kids, but even I have moral issues with killing them.
I could probably take down 25 of them, depeneding on how psycho they are. =/
the result was 18 xD
Thirty of those lil' Rascals. :'D
I beat them up better than Jet Li. :<
Woorrdd.
well, it depends on how big and or hyper they were. I'd have to catch them first, so when I pick them up and throw them into the dumpster, they wouldn't break my back.
So, i'm not entirely sure. Maybe 5 small ones. They would have to stop watching Hanna Montana first.
32. Not a bad number, but if there was enough death metal blaring in the background I could count on a Satanic Aura upgrade after bashing a few of them, thus they would begin to cower in fear or at least think twice.
Eris - I need a DM ruling: Does some really banging Death metal increase the capability to take on more munchkins?
Peace,
DaSOCOM
Well the last time I was in that position I took down the intire pre-school, only minor bruises and bites. 5 years olds arent a much of a challenge, one good whack to tha face and they're down for the count. 10 year olds would be more of a challenge, rather deadly actually.
Well I took the quiz, and my results were that I could take on eighteen five year olds, I thought I could do better, but I guess not D:.
"You could take on 29 five year old kids in a fight."
I chose: "The hell with morality!" and "I'd use them as my own weapon with thinking." :laugh:
Yes I fight dirty. >:D Always. I'd break your neck if necessary.
The quiz said seventeen. But I don't know...Little kids are a lot stronger than most people think.
The actual results came out as 29. <_< I could say take on more than that.
Nigglets thought, could only probably take 29 of.
That is what my thoughts were. I got 27...Quote:
Originally Posted by Xero XIII
Well, seeing that Tae Kwon Do focuses more on leg power...Quote:
Originally Posted by Howlin' A.R. Jeremy III
I can probably take out five five-year olds in one kick.
i could only take out 18
how sad
16.
Probably due to my age.
34 I'd tear those little munchkins apart!!!
28, which seems fairly decent. If I got to charge them then that number would probably go up a bit.
as long they don't kick me in happy sack i can tickle my way up to 50-60, im not fond with kids but for some reason they like me no matter how i treat them, and they always destroy me with their puppy eyes :(
i don't mean hurting them i mean tickles them until they are unconscious by too much laugh
26. I'm not too fond of little kids. Especially when they're toddlers..they tend to be...needy and annoying xD
Just 23. This is really bad :(
Apparently I can take on 25. Although, at heart I'm way too nice to hurt a kid so I probably would lose right away without fighting. Although . . . I wonder, why am I in this fight to begin with?
five if 'em.. and maybe one really skinny, weak one. o.O