GameGeeks
Geek of Games

Nice.

Yikes. What made you return to the forums 2 years alter.

You're right...I got lazy. (In a blog I said I was gonna use this for every absurd thing you said)

Well, here's for every absurd thing you said...

Guess that makes sense, then.

That sounds exciting. What kind of job are you looking for? Had any luck?

When has Castle ever been stranded naked in the middle of a savanna desert thing, though? hahahaha
Not much. Just finished my finals, and have been busy with work. You?

Um, that's Malcolm Reynolds, captain of the 03-K64 Firefly-class transport ship Serenity. He previously served as a sergeant in the Unification war for the Independents with his second-in-command, Zoe Alleyne Washburne. He was born September 20th, 2486 on the planet Shadow. He was raised by his mother and about 40 ranch hands. During the war it was one of the first to stand against the Alliance, with many of it's young folk choosing to fight for the independents- Malcolm among them. However, Shadow has turned into a ghost planet, as all that was left was charred and blackened rock after the Alliance aggressively bombed it in an attempt to show the browncoats a lesson about the power of the Alliance. The bombings did quite the opposite, and hardened the resolve of the browncoats like Mal. After the battle of Serenity Valley the independents started losing ground, and Mal lost his faith in God. Mal may have been on the losing side, but he's still not sure it was the wrong one.

No, I mean he's a hypocrite for calling Clayton's thread stupid.

I would agree with you since I seen situations like that before but at the same time I think VG is just someone with nothing to do at all and comes here for attention, which people always give him. (and that gives him self-satisfaction)

He's just a social reject.

You probably checked this already but the irony is so heavy:

Read a book, boy.

GT has NOTHING to do with his problem of forgetting things though because he has done it multiple times.

And my point flew over your head because we're talking "debates". Point blank, the fact he said "Happy Ending" renders the Super 17 Saga invalid....cause what happened to him there isn't so happy.

That's like using all the inconstant filler to support arguments because "they happened" It doesn't work that way. And canon inconstancy us valid too cause, again i'ts cannon so Akira Toriyama could say that Goku died the day after the 28th Tenkaichi Budokai if he feels like it and it just throws GT out of the water even further. So what if Akira Toriyama says something that contradicts GT completely? Are you still going to use it as an argument against canon logic?

Doesn't matter if you don't like Naruto but they take inconsistent filler to another level--So you're saying they should be used in a, again "a debate" and using against the own logic of the Mangaka?