OH WOW! Disney's Peter Pan cartoon = American "ecchi"

[MegaAnimeFan]

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YnFABHlw-U8

Just watch this and you'll see what I mean.

[Kaleohano]

You would be the one looking for ecchi things in a film aimed at young children -.-

[MegaAnimeFan]

It's blatant "softcore". I'm not sure how this was even allowed to be in a cartoon for kids! I say lockup Mr Disney and everyone who worked on this cartoon, and throw away the key, because they are perverts.

Japanese anime that has stuff like this is usually rated for teens and older, and are not meant as shows/movies for little kids like Peter Pan is.

[Jasanime]

oh please, nothing 'ecchi' about that!

[MegaAnimeFan]

oh please, nothing 'ecchi' about that!

Yeah, you say seductively sexy mermaids wearing little to no clothing, and moving in ways and striking poses that tend to look erotic/alluring aren't "ecchi"? Ecchi is simply the Japanese word meaning "lewd" or "indecent", and if this were an anime it would MOST CERTAINLY be classified as "ecchi" by anime fans. I will admit it doesn't rise to the level of hentai (literally meaning "perverted"), but this specific scene in this Disney cartoon MOST CERTAINLY is "ecchi".

[.:neuko:.]

It's blatant "softcore". I'm not sure how this was even allowed to be in a cartoon for kids! I say lockup Mr Disney and everyone who worked on this cartoon, and throw away the key, because they are perverts.

Japanese anime that has stuff like this is usually rated for teens and older, and are not meant as shows/movies for little kids like Peter Pan is.

An extract from Wikipedia:

"Ecchi (or Etchi, from the Japanese エッチ etchi)comes from the Japanese word meaning "lewd", "sexy", "pervert", or "naughty" when used as an adjective, or it can mean to have sexual intercourse when it is used as a verb or noun. The English use of this word is usually used in manga and anime and it is used when the anime or manga has sexual content, such as skimpy clothing or partial or full nudity, but does not show sexual intercourse.

Ecchi anime usually contains a lot of fan service or nudity, sometimes both. Ecchi anime is also sometimes filled with innuendo and sexual humor. Ecchi anime doesn’t show sex, at least not in a graphical way. Ecchi anime is more similar to an R rated movie with a lot of sexual overtones, such as American Pie."

Now then, let's take a look at that clip you posted:

Sexual content: The mermaids are not doing anything sexual here at all; they're either grooming themselves, enjoying their surroundings, or, in the instance of Peter Pan's arrival, merely flirting--basically, they're behaving according to what one would naturally expect of mermaids (if not typical teenage girls). The mermaid scene in Peter Pan is also fairly consistent with how mermaids are generally portrayed in folklore, which is to say, as mischievous and flirtacious beings. Some myths and legends even portray mermaids as devious or evil sea creatures; these include tales of "monsters" who use their half-human appearance to attract and decieve hapless sailors; those unlucky enough to fall in love with them find themselves pulled underwater and consequently to their deaths. The scene of the mermaids in the clip is romanticised somewhat, but could hardly be considered erotic.

Skimpy clothing: Technically yes, since the mermaids are wearing only "bras" (okay, not all of them, but there's not a single instance of fully exposed breasts here); but they'd be acting out of character if they were to be wearing things such as tops, blouses or skirts--and it'd be neither natural nor practical given their aquatic preferences.

Partial/Full nudity: Not really, since the mermaids' breasts are covered at all times and scales (along with fur and feathers) are generally percieved as natural clothing.

Now putting the above observations aside, yes--it's possible that the people who worked on Peter Pan might have been all perverts; however this doesn't change the fact that there's no "ecchi" in the film (or at least in the clip you provided). Adults of course are free to interpret Peter Pan any way they like, including a scene of flirtacious mermaids as something that says more about their way of thinking than the film itself.

[DeathBlade/13.666]

If you call that ecchi or softcore, boy you have a lot to learn.... Almost make me want to bring VG555 in here to show you, but it'll only create more bullcrap to deal with.

[blueangel06661]

You're in for a bad time..

http://www.freecodesource.com/album-cover/51R6QwXIVUL/-The-Little-Mermaid.jpg

That's just how mermaids are portraid. For instance this version of the little mermaid. I had this movie when I was little.

http://g-ecx.images-amazon.com/images/G/01/ciu/88/1e/ca37225b9da030ef83282110.L.jpg

As for peter pan... Do you have ANY idea how old that show is? Try 1953... That's about 59-60 years ago bro... No one really had their panties in a wad back then about this type of stuff.

[Ranshiin]

If you call that ecchi or softcore, boy you have a lot to learn.... Almost make me want to bring VG555 in here to show you, but it'll only create more bullcrap to deal with.
uh .... he's the OP.

[blueangel06661]

uh .... he's the OP.

^^^^ ditto

[Kaleohano]

Yeah, you say seductively sexy mermaids wearing little to no clothing, and moving in ways and striking poses that tend to look erotic/alluring aren't "ecchi"? Ecchi is simply the Japanese word meaning "lewd" or "indecent", and if this were an anime it would MOST CERTAINLY be classified as "ecchi" by anime fans. I will admit it doesn't rise to the level of hentai (literally meaning "perverted"), but this specific scene in this Disney cartoon MOST CERTAINLY is "ecchi".

you are one very lonely guy, aren't you?
Ariel is erotic? For real dude? So first you like watching 10yr olds getting raped, and now you're shwankin' it to the Little Mermaid.

you probably look sorta like this guy
http://t2.gstatic.com/images?q=tbn:ANd9GcRhp8qzKnD2qCUuhznR65WB1EWnHhoPX k4yAaKow17QwvSezIWEBg

I assume this cuz you seem to find anything thats feminine enough to choke your chicken to.
How about Old Gregg? (he has a mangina! Plenty to satisfy you, i think.)

http://1.bp.blogspot.com/-6N_cqLqf5sY/UBt0lak4PJI/AAAAAAAABIk/FMyagJjB1Z4/s1600/Old_Gregg.jpg

http://images4.wikia.nocookie.net/__cb20090102133203/mightyboosh/images/8/8e/Legendofoldgregg.jpg

[Jasanime]

That's just how mermaids are portraid. For instance this version of the little mermaid. I had this movie when I was little.

http://g-ecx.images-amazon.com/images/G/01/ciu/88/1e/ca37225b9da030ef83282110.L.jpg



That looks familiar, is it really sad and involving a dagger?

[Ωmega]

That looks familiar, is it really sad and involving a dagger?
Yes. In the end she cant kill the prince, so she jumps into the sea and turns into seafoam

[Jasanime]

Yes. In the end she cant kill the prince, so she jumps into the sea and turns into seafoam

Yes! I watched it when I was little and found it very disturbing..

[DeathBlade/13.666]

If you call that ecchi or softcore, boy you have a lot to learn.... Almost make me want to bring VG555 in here to show you, but it'll only create more bullcrap to deal with.
uh .... he's the OP.Oh. Now it all makes sense.

[blueangel06661]

Yes! I watched it when I was little and found it very disturbing..

...I liked it... Maybe I'm just crazy..

[MegaAnimeFan]

An extract from Wikipedia:

"Ecchi (or Etchi, from the Japanese エッチ etchi)comes from the Japanese word meaning "lewd", "sexy", "pervert", or "naughty" when used as an adjective, or it can mean to have sexual intercourse when it is used as a verb or noun. The English use of this word is usually used in manga and anime and it is used when the anime or manga has sexual content, such as skimpy clothing.




Yes they are wearing SKIMPY CLOTHING! Yes it covers all the important parts, but that does not mean that it's not SKIMPY. A lot of skin is showing! THAT IS THE DEFINITION OF SKIMPY! You DO NOT need to have an exposed "bad part" for the clothing to be defined as skimpy. This is almost the strongest form of ecchi. The only way it could be MORE ECCHI is if they lost their tops altogether.

Also partial nudity because of how skimpy even bra/bikintops covered. I mean those BARELY covered even what they needed to. Like change one of them by an inch and the nipple would show. I mean one of them had actual implied nudity. One of them wasn't wearing ANY top that is implied by the fact her hair ALWAYS just "happened" to fall in front of her breasts. She had NO CLOTHING AT ALL, and ONLY had hair to cover her. That is at the very least partial nudity, or you could say full nudity with hair to cover the nudity. Another one was only being covered with a flower necklace that just "coincidentally" fell in front of her breasts in EVERY scene she was in. Again, this counts as partial nudity.

And the ONLY way stuff like this is considered kid-friendly is because kids at the age it's aimed at (like 5 to 8 yo kids) are not of pubescent age, so they don't have a sex drive, and therefore such scenes are not seen by these children as sexual scenes. In other words, the target audience isn't turned on by it. But I guaranty you anyone who's reached the age where they see "chicks" as "hot", (in other words teenage boys, and adults), ABSOLUTELY WILL BE TURNED ON by the mermaids in that scene. And I know this, using myself as an example, because I'm an adult, and I can assure you that this scene with the almost naked (and some who in fact appear to be naked) mermaids DOES turn me on.

You see it's a double intent scene. The makers knew little kids would watch it without seeing it as sexual (cause they wouldn't know what "sexual" even is yet) and just see it as a funny scene with fish people, while teens and adults would watch it and "get off" to it. It was done this way intentionally (I believe) to reach a wide audience of not only children, but also teens and adults. The people at the Disney company knew teens and adults would use it for "fap material", just like Japanese teens and adults use hentai and ecchi anime for "fap material".

While I do believe I was mistaken before in calling it softcore porn, I do think that it ALMOST rises to that level. The only thing that separates it from softcore is that no nipples are shown, as the poses the mermaids are in are most certainly seductive, and they are ALMOST not wearing anything at all.

---------- Post added at 11:39 PM ---------- Previous post was at 09:33 PM ----------

I think this demotivator that I just found, says what I'm trying to say better than I ever could.

http://i.imgur.com/fd7dA.jpg

[Kaleohano]

Yes they are wearing SKIMPY CLOTHING! Yes it covers all the important parts, but that does not mean that it's not SKIMPY. A lot of skin is showing! THAT IS THE DEFINITION OF SKIMPY! You DO NOT need to have an exposed "bad part" for the clothing to be defined as skimpy. This is almost the strongest form of ecchi. The only way it could be MORE ECCHI is if they lost their tops altogether.

Also partial nudity because of how skimpy even bra/bikintops covered. I mean those BARELY covered even what they needed to. Like change one of them by an inch and the nipple would show. I mean one of them had actual implied nudity. One of them wasn't wearing ANY top that is implied by the fact her hair ALWAYS just "happened" to fall in front of her breasts. She had NO CLOTHING AT ALL, and ONLY had hair to cover her. That is at the very least partial nudity, or you could say full nudity with hair to cover the nudity. Another one was only being covered with a flower necklace that just "coincidentally" fell in front of her breasts in EVERY scene she was in. Again, this counts as partial nudity.

And the ONLY way stuff like this is considered kid-friendly is because kids at the age it's aimed at (like 5 to 8 yo kids) are not of pubescent age, so they don't have a sex drive, and therefore such scenes are not seen by these children as sexual scenes. In other words, the target audience isn't turned on by it. But I guaranty you anyone who's reached the age where they see "chicks" as "hot", (in other words teenage boys, and adults), ABSOLUTELY WILL BE TURNED ON by the mermaids in that scene. And I know this, using myself as an example, because I'm an adult, and I can assure you that this scene with the almost naked (and some who in fact appear to be naked) mermaids DOES turn me on.

You see it's a double intent scene. The makers knew little kids would watch it without seeing it as sexual (cause they wouldn't know what "sexual" even is yet) and just see it as a funny scene with fish people, while teens and adults would watch it and "get off" to it. It was done this way intentionally (I believe) to reach a wide audience of not only children, but also teens and adults. The people at the Disney company knew teens and adults would use it for "fap material", just like Japanese teens and adults use hentai and ecchi anime for "fap material".

While I do believe I was mistaken before in calling it softcore porn, I do think that it ALMOST rises to that level. The only thing that separates it from softcore is that no nipples are shown, as the poses the mermaids are in are most certainly seductive, and they are ALMOST not wearing anything at all.

---------- Post added at 11:39 PM ---------- Previous post was at 09:33 PM ----------

I think this demotivator that I just found, says what I'm trying to say better than I ever could.

http://i.imgur.com/fd7dA.jpg

once again, you prove yourself to be a lonely pervert that is way too easily entertained.

[MegaAnimeFan]

OMG HAWT DISNEY CHICKS!

From Peter Pan:

http://i.imgur.com/GV82A.jpg
Sexy mermaid wearing BARELY ANYTHING! SEXY, YEAH!

http://i.imgur.com/Hpb4F.jpg?1
Topless mermaid with her boobs covered ONLY BY HER HAIR! VERY HOT!

http://i.imgur.com/Ossxh.jpg
Topless mermaid with her boobs covered ONLY BY A FLOWER NECKLACE! VERY HOT! AND CAN EVEN SEE THE OUTLINE OF ONE OF HER BOOBS; EVEN HOTTER!



From The Little Mermaid:

http://i.imgur.com/Bp1GN.jpg
Ariel; sexy as ever!



From The Hunchback of Notre Dame:

http://i.imgur.com/kI7pi.jpg
Esmeralda; A very beautiful woman.



From Aladdin:

http://i.imgur.com/YwANM.jpg
Jasmine. Wow I can't think of anything that I wouldn't do to make her real for just one day, so I could have some "fun" with her, if you know what I mean.

[Chewbaka]

Oh god, this thread. If I'm reading this right, this piece of advice applies to you, MegaAnimeFan: don't get it caught in the zipper.

[blueangel06661]

while teens and adults would watch it and "get off" to it. It was done this way intentionally (I believe) to reach a wide audience of not only children, but also teens and adults. The people at the Disney company knew teens and adults would use it for "fap material", just like Japanese teens and adults use hentai and ecchi anime for "fap material".

YOU ARE ABSOLUTELY SICK AND TWISTED.

No normal teen or adult would "get off" to something like that. It's a friggin cartoon for crying out loud. Without much showing anyways. I watched these movies, as a kid. Didn't think anything of it. I watch these movies as an adult I STILL DO NOT THINK ANYTHING OF IT. You are making me very VERY upset right now.

I work for disney and your arguments are just incorrect and don't apply to anyone but you. I think you and fellow screwed up people are the ONLY ones who could/would even try to get off on stuff such as this, and they should never be considered the majority. I'm sure you're one of those creeps who would do horrible horrible things to that pink haired girl from lazy town that all the pedos love.

You are absolutely sick.

[Ranshiin]

Well, if the other threads weren't proof that he's Videogamer555, then this recent post does.

slow_clap.gif

[OminousCloud]

Uhm... mermaids are supposed to be man seducing strumpets. Their nature has been toned down since it's a children's film which is why they're 'covered up', but children wouldn't respond to them in a sexual nature nor readily think of them in such a way so moot point. Keep in mind that really young kids often bathe with their parents and some would have younger siblings and see their mum breastfeeding. Not all nudity is gratuitous and bad, get over it.

[Chewbaka]

Not all nudity is gratuitous and bad, get over it.
Selective quoting, ho! This point is valid and supported by me.

[Ranshiin]

Not all nudity is gratuitous and bad, get over it.

OP also isn't aware how public view on such things has changed over the years. Like how once upon a time women had absolutely no votes, or how once upon a time people of black race were slaves. Woe betide that when these movies were produced it was considered acceptable by the general public to have a limited amount of stomach visible on a cartoon female character! Woe betide that even in modern times the general public's consensus on such things as this is ... god is there a word more indifferent than 'meh'? I really want to know.

God help him with Who Framed Roger Rabbit. God help him indeed.

[DeathBlade/13.666]

Yes they are wearing SKIMPY CLOTHING! Yes it covers all the important parts, but that does not mean that it's not SKIMPY. A lot of skin is showing! THAT IS THE DEFINITION OF SKIMPY! You DO NOT need to have an exposed "bad part" for the clothing to be defined as skimpy. This is almost the strongest form of ecchi. The only way it could be MORE ECCHI is if they lost their tops altogether. Oh it's not that skimpy. Especially by today's standards. Though Mermaids have always been pictured like that. It's nothing new, just look at stuff from the early folklore.


Also partial nudity because of how skimpy even bra/bikintops covered. I mean those BARELY covered even what they needed to. Like change one of them by an inch and the nipple would show. I mean one of them had actual implied nudity. One of them wasn't wearing ANY top that is implied by the fact her hair ALWAYS just "happened" to fall in front of her breasts. She had NO CLOTHING AT ALL, and ONLY had hair to cover her. That is at the very least partial nudity, or you could say full nudity with hair to cover the nudity. Another one was only being covered with a flower necklace that just "coincidentally" fell in front of her breasts in EVERY scene she was in. Again, this counts as partial nudity. Again, Mermaids have always be depicted like such. Not Disney's fault or problem. Tough the seashells might be new, and then there's this.
http://tundracomics.com/AdvHTML_Upload/MERMAID.jpg


And the ONLY way stuff like this is considered kid-friendly is because kids at the age it's aimed at (like 5 to 8 yo kids) are not of pubescent age, so they don't have a sex drive, and therefore such scenes are not seen by these children as sexual scenes. In other words, the target audience isn't turned on by it. But I guaranty you anyone who's reached the age where they see "chicks" as "hot", (in other words teenage boys, and adults), ABSOLUTELY WILL BE TURNED ON by the mermaids in that scene. And I know this, using myself as an example, because I'm an adult, and I can assure you that this scene with the almost naked (and some who in fact appear to be naked) mermaids DOES turn me on.

You see it's a double intent scene. The makers knew little kids would watch it without seeing it as sexual (cause they wouldn't know what "sexual" even is yet) and just see it as a funny scene with fish people, while teens and adults would watch it and "get off" to it. It was done this way intentionally (I believe) to reach a wide audience of not only children, but also teens and adults. The people at the Disney company knew teens and adults would use it for "fap material", just like Japanese teens and adults use hentai and ecchi anime for "fap material". And how many mermaids have you seen with more than just seashells and maybe a tiara?


While I do believe I was mistaken before in calling it softcore porn, I do think that it ALMOST rises to that level. The only thing that separates it from softcore is that no nipples are shown, as the poses the mermaids are in are most certainly seductive, and they are ALMOST not wearing anything at all.
Technically they weren't wearing anything if they do have the seashells on.... Not like ther can just up on a pair of pants, though giving them a shirt might help. Then again, we all know about wet t-shirt contests.

Why don't you quit telling more about yourself than anyone ever cares to know about? It's not helping your case, and only making you look more sheltered from the real world.

[vrarsenal]

Jesus.
You are sick.

[Kaleohano]

OMG HAWT DISNEY CHICKS!

From Peter Pan:

http://i.imgur.com/GV82A.jpg
Sexy mermaid wearing BARELY ANYTHING! SEXY, YEAH!

http://i.imgur.com/Hpb4F.jpg?1
Topless mermaid with her boobs covered ONLY BY HER HAIR! VERY HOT!

http://i.imgur.com/Ossxh.jpg
Topless mermaid with her boobs covered ONLY BY A FLOWER NECKLACE! VERY HOT! AND CAN EVEN SEE THE OUTLINE OF ONE OF HER BOOBS; EVEN HOTTER!



From The Little Mermaid:

http://i.imgur.com/Bp1GN.jpg
Ariel; sexy as ever!



From The Hunchback of Notre Dame:

http://i.imgur.com/kI7pi.jpg
Esmeralda; A very beautiful woman.



From Aladdin:

http://i.imgur.com/YwANM.jpg
Jasmine. Wow I can't think of anything that I wouldn't do to make her real for just one day, so I could have some "fun" with her, if you know what I mean.

i have a question, how old are you?

---------- Post added at 11:03 AM ---------- Previous post was at 10:54 AM ----------


is there a word more indifferent than 'meh'?

To find this you must eat a Meh Suflet. This will give you the understanding of "Meh Supreme." Good luck young one!
oh and to make the challenge more difficult, your Meh Suflet is at the other end of this path through a dark forest filled with many different forms of Videogamer555 and you must wear this shirt which has a picture of Ariel on the back. Think you can still handle it?

---------- Post added at 11:21 AM ---------- Previous post was at 11:03 AM ----------

Heres a little present for ya

http://alecsimone.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/03/dar-is-late-40.jpg

and hey... MegaAnimeFan
http://cdn.memegenerator.net/instances/250x250/26465267.jpg

[Light Buster]

I see no point to this...

[MegaAnimeFan]

Just to let you know, I'm not the only one critical of Disney females in Skimpy clothing and in some cases outright toplessness.
http://forums.tannerworld.com/showthread.php?t=35115

Now back on topic about mermaids in Disney's Peter Pan, first of all the amount of coverage provided by the seashells approximates a bikini top, and the average person with "conservative" views will see such bikini swimwear as "borderline decent/indecent". It is NOT in the "perfectly decent" category like you are trying to make it out to be. And if you live in the US, and talk to ANY "conservative" person, that is what they will tell you.

Just to let you know, I also watch Sailor Moon and Tokyo Mew Mew (the unedited Japnese version that is) cause they got sexy nude transformation scenes. I really can get *cough*excited*cough* about such scenes. And yes in addition to the "kid friendly according to American values, Disney version" of The Little Mermaid, I have also seen the even less censored Japanese-anime version of The Little Mermaid (the one with the blond mermaid, where she is topless, and her entire breast area is visible and the only "censoring" done is to not draw nipples on her). And THAT version of The Little Mermaid, I have several screencaps from in my "hot nude chick pinups" folder on my computer.



Oh, and here's some more Disney pinup chicks.

From Fantasia:

http://i.imgur.com/GWZcf.jpg
Blue centaur; not entirely human (even less human in appearance than mermaids), but still sexy.


http://i.imgur.com/hedYV.png
Most ultimate Disney "ecchi" EVAR! I think "something" is pitching a tent, whenver I see this scene. As you can see here there was one point when Disney actually made nude humanoids (centaurs in this case), and like the Japanese anime version of The Little Mermaid, Disney's nudes were drawn without the nipples (or other "bad" parts). But yep, that's right. at one point Disney not only did "almost nudes" like in Peter Pan, in a more distant past Disney actually did real "nude" art (nice way of saying "ecchi" cartoons)!. Disney has always tended to follow society's values/morals of whatever the current era was, and the era when this was made, the USA had such low morals, and was so dirty minded and sexaully corrupt that the USA was ACTUALLY THE "WESTERN" EQUIVALENT TO WHAT JAPAN IS IN ASIA RIGHT NOW!!!!! And THAT IS THE ONLY REASON this cartoon was permitted. However not many people buy the BluRay or DVD or VHS in modern times because it is considered "too old" so nobody buys it in modern times, so parents of the "modern" more "conservative" time we live in now have not yet had the opportunity to view it according to MODERN standards and send complaint letters to Disney. If they did, this scene would be ENTIRELY REMOVED from the most recent DVD/BluRay release. Yet it's not. Those hot naked almost human female bodies are still there for anyone who watches to fap to. Only the so called "racist" scene (which was a sub-section of the overall centaurs scene) has been removed.

http://i.imgur.com/eulzol.jpg
Pink haired centaur is striking a sexy pose like the pose was plagiarized right from Playboy magazine.

http://i.imgur.com/vCcOB.png
http://i.imgur.com/EmnaW.png
http://i.imgur.com/XnFa9.png
WOW SEXY, VERY SEXY! These are 3 frames from an animated gif that was made from screencaps of Fantasia that I found on the net. Just looking at these pics makes something "grow" on me, if you know what I mean.

[Chewbaka]

MegaAnimeFan You are silly. Such a silly person. Now, do us a favor, and go back to the basement.

[Anime Forum]

AF has officially hit a low. AF has finally reached the point of accusing Disney of ecchi? Megaanimefan, you sicken me. I truly mean that. Aren't most Disney programs created for the younger audiences? I'd like to watch Disney movies without getting these sick thoughts in my head thank you. Truly the dumbest post/thread in recent AF history.

[Yugami]

If That ecchi...
That was the most bad ecchi :P

I think thats just a tactic how to make the Girl cute... :)

[MegaAnimeFan]

And now a few more just to make my list complete.

From W.I.T.C.H. (a "mahou shojo" anime and manga made by Disney, and a blatant American ripoff of what was originally a Japanese genre):
Note: While a number of the characters do resemble the manga/anime style (in both the comic book and TV cartoon), they don't do it as well as a real anime or manga. And for comparison, let me tell you that in Japan there was actually a manga made based on it (but more on that when I get to it in the pictures).

One of the hottest Disney chicks so far created is Will Vandom from the W.I.T.C.H. series so these pictures will mostly be about her.

http://i.imgur.com/zgSa2.jpg
Very sexy pic of her from the TV show (in "Guardian" mode).

http://i.imgur.com/1c8yw.jpg
Very sexy pic of her in official art in the comic book style (again in "Guardian" mode).

http://i.imgur.com/G2Wgn.jpg
Like on page 3, and we are already on the fast track to a very "ecchi" comic (on a level only previously seen from Japanese companies). I mean this is a FULL NAKED PIC OF A HUMAN TEENAGE GIRL (with only censorship being once again not drawing the nipples)! HOT PIC OF A HOT CHICK! THIS GOES RIGHT IN MY PINUPS FOLDER ON MY COMPUTER! THANK YOU DISNEY! This is her in "normal" mode by the way, but she appears to be having some kind of mystical "vision".

http://i.imgur.com/L3hXJ.jpg
And of course just as in any "mahou shoujou" you have the required nude henshin/transformation scene. Definitely sexy.

http://i.imgur.com/ghWL3.jpg
Here you can again see Will in her sexy bare midriff costume that she has in her powered-up "Guardian" mode, this time in the comic book.

As I said before, Japan didn't have the comic book released in their country, but they made their own official Disney licensed manga instead. Here's some pics I found online of that, so you can now see Will's "manga form" (you already know what her comic book and TV cartoon forms look like).

http://i.imgur.com/ERtldl.jpg (http://i.imgur.com/ERtld.jpg)
She's the chick in the center of the pic. (click to see full sized pic)

http://i.imgur.com/8PDbg.jpg
This is the cover of one of the issues of this manga. She's the red haired girl in the pic.

http://i.imgur.com/c4ZcQ.gif
A page of the manga that's in color.

http://i.imgur.com/TG53W.jpg
Here Will is wearing a stereotypical pointy "Halloween witch" hat.

http://i.imgur.com/0B5og.jpg
This is another pic I found on the net. You can clearly see on the left page that Will is the sexy chick near the right side of the page, and you can see she's in her powered-up "Guardian" mode.

End note on the manga:
As with most manga, the pages are mostly black and white.



And now what you've all been waiting for. DISNEY'S LIVE ACTION CHICKS!

Selena Gomez:

http://i.imgur.com/YrUEB.jpg
Sexy!

http://i.imgur.com/4E6ZW.jpg
Sexy!

http://i.imgur.com/jiJvT.jpg
Sexy!

http://i.imgur.com/b7foH.jpg
Sexy!



Miley Cyrus:

http://i.imgur.com/H4CV6.jpg
Sexy chick is Sexy!

http://i.imgur.com/NHjnV.jpg
Thank you Miley for wearing clothes that cover only some of your boob area, and almost expose your nipples. Mild ecchi.

http://i.imgur.com/7DHwd.jpg
Miley in hot bikini is HOT MILEY! Getting more ecchi.

http://i.imgur.com/v9wlX.jpg
Of course given that I'm saying just how much ecchi Disney makes, I couldn't leave this out. This is Miley in her "Vanity Fair" photoshoot, wearing no clothes (aka NAKED aka NUDE), and only covered by a sheet. Yes that's right, Disney allowed Vanity Fair to make GENUINE ECCHI out of their teen star, who was only 15 at the time (WTH!).
Note on this pic:
Lots of parents thought she was being a "bad rolemodel" for kids by doing this, so parents had lots of BAAAWWWWW and WAMBULANCE and contacted the news media to complain, and a brief news story about this actually made it to the "nightly news" on TV.

Looks like Disney and Japan aren't so different from each other after all.

[DeathBlade/13.666]

Well now that we've proven a new low to your immaturity, and you've seem to have gotten off topic from the original Peter Pan. On top of that I believe everyone else just wants this thread closed and done with.

So I must do the will of the majority. And with that this thread is closed.