~Surveillance video released in an assault case against a King County, Wash. Sheriff’s deputy shows him kicking a young girl, slamming her to the jail cell floor and striking her repeatedly. The deputy has pleaded not guilty in case....oÔ
AnimeGalleries [dot] Net | AnimeWallpapers [dot] Com | AnimeLyrics [dot] Com | AnimePedia [dot] Com | AnimeGlobe [dot] Com |
~Surveillance video released in an assault case against a King County, Wash. Sheriff’s deputy shows him kicking a young girl, slamming her to the jail cell floor and striking her repeatedly. The deputy has pleaded not guilty in case....oÔ
Now thats really strange that he doesnt feel guilty about what he did. No matter how big the crime can be , you cannot hit a girl like that.
A slap ,okay i am watching , But a kick and then slammed in the floor grabbing her hair, i mean what was that...
Its so bad to look at.
Last edited by Necro'lic Enigma; 03-02-2009 at 09:26 AM.
wish me luck for furture guys!!!!Thanks for everything!!!^___^
Thats horrible! why did he do that?? she just took off her shoes :S what is his problem? i dont know how he could say hes not guilty, i hope he gets convicted.
It's just plain sick.
She didn't just take off her shoes. She launched them at a very low altitude and at decent speed. She fired a weapon...
What's really sick is that every police brutality video I see shows mostly black people either getting the end of a TASER or getting mauled by an angry mob of white cops.It's just plain sick.
Police abusing thier power :/ it's sad really.
ein, zwei, drei, vier bin endlich weg von Dir
fünf, sechs, sieben, acht Du hast jetzt keine Macht
♥
Legal Definition of Guilt ≠ Feeling of Emotional Responsibility.Originally Posted by Silent Madness
You must be new here, welcome to Earth.No matter how big the crime can be , you cannot hit a girl like that.
Because he's a policeman and he was wearing a uniform. Legally, that puts you somewhere above god in most cases. It's not a hard case for him to win: he just has to convince the jury that she was resisting him (and she was, as far as that goes) and that he needed to restrain her. Most people wouldn't see that beating as particularly severe, so it's not particularly hard to dismiss it as warranted. I imagine the prosecutor will focus on the parts where she's pulled by her hair though, so it really will come down to the respective skill of the lawyers. I'd still bet on a not guilty verdict, though.Originally Posted by Bunny Feet
Don't think it's justified myself, but it's not so egregious that I think the police officer will actually be tried fairly.
Ehhh, I dunno if I'll stick around. We'll see.
The List of Hate, My self-indulgent journal-thing.
Last Post: Video Vomit 05/11/11
So much tam-tam about things which happen fairly often.
Where authority is, will also always be abuse.
I'd kick instead the press-people in the nuts, for over-popularizing this.
Now- trial is the logical result. Let the *blind* justice decide.
Last edited by None of the above; 03-02-2009 at 12:18 PM.
Most likley (sadly) true - which is probably why the defence pushed for the release to the media of the videos - which normally would not be released till after a trial.
By doing it this way the policeman is now in the position of being an icon and thus the result of his trial will be much more defined by the opinion of the public in this case - since they have to keep face with the general public - especially if the media play things up (which they are likley to do)
either way (the way of the officer getting a pardon on grounds of officers sticking together or the way of the media pushing for a harsh sentence) is the wrong way but its the way things seem to work in the world
sig by shougo amakousa
Quote Eris:
There are no rules. They are just words on a piece of paper.
So, in other words, you care decidedly more because the person in question had overys versus a teenage male getting beat for being an angry jerk?
Yeah, your inequities sound fair. That's declare a little over half of the population physically inviolable to satisfy your goofy sense of honor. Everyone's equal, it's just that some are more equal then others, eh comrade?
Ehhh, I dunno if I'll stick around. We'll see.
The List of Hate, My self-indulgent journal-thing.
Last Post: Video Vomit 05/11/11
INEXCUSABLE.
320 years have passed since the coven sank into the dark
I may have been born in The United States, but running through my veins is 70,000% UK blood.
Here's something from my blog:
http://www.animeforum.com/blog.php?1...y-Special-Blog
Yes, everyone is equal, I agree, but no person, especially a pregnant inmate, deserves that! She's a girl and he's a sheriff. Thats a bit unfair, don't you think especially if she tries to defens herself, he can legally kill her for assault and endangerment to a police officer.
Yea I saw this on the news. I think its so sick and wrong what he did. Just because hes a cop dosnt mean he had to go way too far like that.
The problem is that your first statement (Everyone is Equal) contradicts with the second (ESPECIALLY females). Either everyone is equal or they aren't (and they aren't, but I'm talking about your statement).
Also, since when did she become pregnant? Sauce?
The thing is, that if police officers aren't considered more important from a legal standpoint then it's harder for them to do their job. For example, if a police officer apprehends a burglar and has to pull him to the ground and cuff him, he should be protected from the legal consequences you or I would face for doing the same thing on a lark. In general, if they commit certain crimes in the name of the law they should be protected. They should also be given protection from acts of revenge stemming from the execution of their duties (killing an officer for arresting your dad is severely frowned upon, for example).She's a girl and he's a sheriff. Thats a bit unfair, don't you think especially if she tries to defens herself, he can legally kill her for assault and endangerment to a police officer.
Last edited by Manhattan_Project_2000; 03-02-2009 at 01:33 PM.
Ehhh, I dunno if I'll stick around. We'll see.
The List of Hate, My self-indulgent journal-thing.
Last Post: Video Vomit 05/11/11
Ok, so she kicks off her shoes, the officers rush in and restrain her while grabbing her hair and punching her in the back of the head.
However, I didn't see the "weapon" .. unless her shoes were the "weapon" and the officer's defense was punching her in the back of the head; then that is just ridiculous. If she had a sharp instrument or other device she could have used to cause actual harm, then I might see why they used such force.
But she's a small girl, and the officers are obviously alot bigger and stronger than her. I'm not entirely sure what damage shoes could have done.
The video was silent also, unless she used obscenities or threats -- I don't see why such force was nessasary.
Last edited by Miss Moonlight; 03-02-2009 at 01:34 PM.
月の光は愛のメッセージ
What a lucky! She got off easy! she should count her blessings that the cop wasn't brutal.
In Capitalizt America Cop beats You!
Last edited by Aizmov; 03-02-2009 at 01:51 PM.
I'm sure she wouldn't have kicked her shoes off unless the police told her to. Since it's silent, I can't tell, but that's my guess. I can't really explain why he would attack her like that for (presumably) following his order, but whatever. She seems to resist while pinned to the floor, but who wouldn't? That's instinct. He could have easily started raping her. It's tricky. Will come down to both their testimonies and skill of lawyers.
Why would police officers compromise the integrity of their case by such acts? It just seems counterproductive to me.
Back, by popular demand! Now with new avy.
i dont know what she did, but just taking her down and restraining her shouldve been enough. kicking her and then hitting her head against the wall after pushing her so far was unnecessary, and then just throwing her to the ground and holding her hair... its just wrong. i know the police have more freedom with these things than "normal" people, but wasnt that too much? its like that guy who the police thought was armed for no real reason, and they shot at him like 50 times and hit him with 17 bullets i think. and the man who was shot had nothing dangerous on him at all. i know these two are a bit different, but its the same thing: the police using too much violence for no real reason.
Police officers take threats of violence very seriously. Or at least, around here, they do. That is, if she actually --used--- them, which we don't know.Originally Posted by Eris
I didn't say it is, or was justified -- just that it looks different if she had actually used them. As it is now, the officers don't look too great ganging up on a small girl who seemingly did nothing but kick off her shoes at them.
Last edited by Miss Moonlight; 03-02-2009 at 02:00 PM.
月の光は愛のメッセージ
More stupidity. Great.
WARNING: This user is wanted for unauthorized access into Ultratech archives. If you see this user in person, please contact Ultratech immediately.
It's hardly news. Plato addressed the problem some 2,500 years ago, and precious little has changed since.
Power attracts sociopaths like manure attracts flies.
Hey look, Japan made a movie about me!
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Bookmarks