Originally Posted by
Videogamer555
Actually Jessi Slaughter was much tamer than this because it didn't deal with porn at all (although a couple of the pics were a bit risque, nothing close to porn, and the images along with the descriptive text and couple sample videos, were meant to show how she clearly had issues). The ENTIRE point of that post was that it dealt with an extremely disturbed young girl and the problems she faced on the internet. It was a NEWS STORY about her. It was not done to be "sensational" or "shocking" like some of my other posts. It was ENTIRELY meant to be informational. And yet you guys STILL downvoted it just as strongly as you have done to this "demotivator" post (which WAS posted just to be shocking).
You guys clearly can NOT TELL the difference between my GOOD POSTS and my INTENTIONALLY BAD POSTS!
Bookmarks