Originally Posted by
Bassoonista
It depends. I'm a member of a 3DS forum, and believe it or not but a large amount of members won't shut up about how they feel iPhones are superior.
Plus, it's a very unpopular opinion among analysts.
Besides, if the casuals really think that is true, than it is definitely an unpopular opinion.
Well, mobile gaming is still cheap but I see where you are coming from now. I don't know how is still unpopular when a (one) forum of "stupid" people have a "stupid" opinion but alright, I'll take your word on it.
It's relatively unpopular among The Sims 3 community who think that it is a great Expansion Pack because it focused on families and bringing "charm" back. They're distracted by shiny objects like strollers, bunk beds, and a type of stair cases that they had been asking for from the beginning, while completely ignoring how the EP added close to nothing to differentiate it from being equal to the $20 less category Stuff Pack. And it even failed at its own concept. All they could add was fart jokes and other stupid pranks instead of actually adding something of substance, like university for young adults, instruments for kids to play, open restaurants for couples to date in (believe it or not, they added "dating" in Generations, but it doesn't matter since your couple just disappears into a building and you never get to play any of it.), or anything for the baby lifestage. I'm so glad to know where EA's priorities are.
Same as the first response, I guess you are going by individual forums (that follows said category) instead of gamers as a whole though.
But alright.
I have to defend this one big time. Pay attention to the wording: "Animal Crossing City Folk is horrible game as a result of laziness and unnecessary changes, not because it was "more of the same"."
I know that thinking it is the worst of the three is not necessarily an unpopular opinion, but my reasoning behind thinking it is so is unpopular. Reviewers and gamers that don't really understand the series only faulted City Folk for being "more of the same", and not the real problems with the games like majorly downgraded and more repetitive villager interaction, the removal of animal pictures (a goal in WW), how the city took away replay value by taking all of the special visitors and putting them in the city to visit anytime you wanted, etc. Everybody is so blinded by "OMG! it's more of the same" because they don't understand life simulation games in the least, and it gets on my last nerve.
Faulting the game for being "more of the same" is only going to force Nintendo to screw the series up even more by making stupid changes just to change things rather than actually making true improvements where they are needed.
Okay, now I understand.
Bookmarks