Re: "Noob" demotivational poster
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Videogamer555
Actually Jessi Slaughter was much tamer than this because it didn't deal with porn at all (although a couple of the pics were a bit risque, nothing close to porn, and the images along with the descriptive text and couple sample videos, were meant to show how she clearly had issues). The ENTIRE point of that post was that it dealt with an extremely disturbed young girl and the problems she faced on the internet. It was a NEWS STORY about her. It was not done to be "sensational" or "shocking" like some of my other posts. It was ENTIRELY meant to be informational. And yet you guys STILL downvoted it just as strongly as you have done to this "demotivator" post (which WAS posted just to be shocking).
You guys clearly can NOT TELL the difference between my GOOD POSTS and my INTENTIONALLY BAD POSTS!
Of course we can't tell what good post you make and which ones are bad because what they all have in common is that they're just bad. First off, your demotivator isn't funny. You don't know funny and to be funny is you don't try. Sad thing is you try. We don't give sh*ts if you're a pervert, but it's damn weird you like 2D women who don't exist and think they'll love you back. That's when you need severe help. And your trolling sucks, I mean... you bring good trollers to shame.
You can really piss me off and you should just stop this garbage. Clearly no one wants you here.
Re: "Noob" demotivational poster
Re: "Noob" demotivational poster
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Videogamer555
Actually my post was a "demotivator" intent. It was NOT to condone CP. Whatever perve took the original image (the that was being covered in that news story), deserves to be SHOT IN THE FACE. I'm no perve. This was just a joke as any other "demotivator" you have seen is meant to be a joke. Sheesh why are you taking my posts so seriously. Lighten up a bit will ya? I'm just being funny.
That isn't a joke that is just sick and if you think that is funny then you must be sick in the head.
This is how you do a proper de-motivator that doesn't look like you sick excuse for one.
Here endeth my participation here and hopefully the last time I have to waste anymore of my laptops already dying battery on your stupid braindead posts.
Re: "Noob" demotivational poster
Had to be done.
Scumbag Videogamer555
http://i.imgur.com/JkEnO.png
Re: "Noob" demotivational poster
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Souhi
That's just dumb.
Quote:
Originally Posted by
demonix
I don't get the point of that demotivator.
Re: "Noob" demotivational poster
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Videogamer555
That's just dumb.
http://i895.photobucket.com/albums/a...op-posting.jpg
Re: "Noob" demotivational poster
What? Wait... V555 is still on this forum? I thought he got himself perma-banned weeks ago...
Re: "Noob" demotivational poster
Quote:
Originally Posted by
marvel_phoenix
What? Wait... V555 is still on this forum? I thought he got himself perma-banned weeks ago...
I don't think we have permanent bans o.O
Re: "Noob" demotivational poster
I thought it was extinct.
Re: "Noob" demotivational poster
Quote:
Originally Posted by
demonix
LOLing at your demotivator. You don't even know the laws in my state. In Washington State, a parent can give permission for a minor to get married. Being married to that minor is recognized under the law as consent to have sex. So even if a minor doesn't on their own have the legal right to consent to have sex, their parent can consent to them being married, and then marrying that individual DOES legally constitute consent to have sex. Read the laws, that you can be found guilty of a sex crime for involving a minor. They ALL state that the minor in question must not be married to the older person in question, if that person is to be guilty of a sex crime.
I'm quoting here directly from the official laws of Washington State as found at http://apps.leg.wa.gov/rcw and covering the statutory rape laws from "least bad" (3rd degree) to worst (1st degree), and I've also bolded and underlined and italicized the important phrase in each, to make sure you don't miss it.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rape of a child in the third degree.
A person is guilty of rape of a child in the third degree when the person has sexual intercourse with another who is at least fourteen years old but less than sixteen years old and not married to the perpetrator and the perpetrator is at least forty-eight months older than the victim.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rape of a child in the second degree.
A person is guilty of rape of a child in the second degree when the person has sexual intercourse with another who is at least twelve years old but less than fourteen years old and not married to the perpetrator and the perpetrator is at least thirty-six months older than the victim.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rape of a child in the first degree.
A person is guilty of rape of a child in the first degree when the person has sexual intercourse with another who is less than twelve years old and not married to the perpetrator and the perpetrator is at least twenty-four months older than the victim.
So to put it simply, if a person over the age of consent marries a minor with the parents' permission, and while married they engage in sexual intercourse, NO CRIME HAS OCCURRED!
That was for statutory rape. For child molestation (which means contact of a sexual nature but not actual sexual intercourse) the laws (again listed from least to worst, that is 3rd degree to 1st degree) state that:
Quote:
Originally Posted by Child molestation in the third degree.
A person is guilty of child molestation in the third degree when the person has, or knowingly causes another person under the age of eighteen to have, sexual contact with another who is at least fourteen years old but less than sixteen years old and not married to the perpetrator and the perpetrator is at least forty-eight months older than the victim.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Child molestation in the second degree.
A person is guilty of child molestation in the second degree when the person has, or knowingly causes another person under the age of eighteen to have, sexual contact with another who is at least twelve years old but less than fourteen years old and not married to the perpetrator and the perpetrator is at least thirty-six months older than the victim.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Child molestation in the first degree.
A person is guilty of child molestation in the first degree when the person has, or knowingly causes another person under the age of eighteen to have, sexual contact with another who is less than twelve years old and not married to the perpetrator and the perpetrator is at least thirty-six months older than the victim.
In other words, if a minor and an adult are married, it is not illegal for the adult to touch the minor in a sexual manner.
Here's the links to the official pages of the laws.
Child rape in the
third degree http://apps.leg.wa.gov/rcw/default.aspx?cite=9A.44.079
second degree http://apps.leg.wa.gov/rcw/default.aspx?cite=9A.44.076
first degree http://apps.leg.wa.gov/rcw/default.aspx?cite=9A.44.073
Child molestation in the
third degree http://apps.leg.wa.gov/rcw/default.aspx?cite=9A.44.089
second degree http://apps.leg.wa.gov/rcw/default.aspx?cite=9A.44.086
first degree http://apps.leg.wa.gov/rcw/default.aspx?cite=9A.44.083
Re: "Noob" demotivational poster
@Kaitou Ace
PLEASSSSSSSSE will you just hear me out just once............. For a christmas present I'm beggin' man D:
1 Attachment(s)
Re: "Noob" demotivational poster
Hai hai.... here you go.
Attachment 55714
I have no idea how that happened >_> <_<
Re: "Noob" demotivational poster
Though I feel bad for @Gjallarhorn and @LadyPSerenity for being the only people who have to put up with him now.
Re: "Noob" demotivational poster
Press "Like" if you think it's @Videogamer555 's fantasy to have sexual intercourse with a minor.
I don't even know why is he saying all that, or care. I feel like that is something is fixiated with.
Re: "Noob" demotivational poster
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Kaitou Ace
I have no idea how that happened >_> <_<
Da forum works in mysterious ways...
http://images1.wikia.nocookie.net/__...50px-Terry.png
Re: "Noob" demotivational poster
Lol...@Kaitou Ace
Did you *cough*logged in into his account*cough*? From my knowledge the only way you could've done that....
Meh, it was for a good cause....
Re: "Noob" demotivational poster
I hope this isn't an actual troll thread, because everything got taken too seriously too fast.
Whatever the case, the OP made a good point.
When censoring nudity, specially on television, it should be done right, not in a lazy manner.
1 Attachment(s)
Re: "Noob" demotivational poster
There's a feature I have.... It's very handy when someone says "I can't seem to do ____ on the forum" and asking people for their password is never a good idea.
Attachment 55715
Re: "Noob" demotivational poster
Re: "Noob" demotivational poster
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Kaitou Ace
There's a feature I have.... It's very handy when someone says "I can't seem to do ____ on the forum" and asking people for their password is never a good idea.
Attachment 55715
Doesn't that make you a stalker?
Re: "Noob" demotivational poster
Not really... it's more of an account takeover then anything else. So body snatching vs stalking, I'd say.
Re: "Noob" demotivational poster
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Kaitou Ace
Not really... it's more of an account takeover then anything else. So body snatching vs stalking, I'd say.
So you can basically invade our privacy as well? http://www.narutoforums.com/images/s.../vegetajv2.gif
Re: "Noob" demotivational poster
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Kaitou Ace
Not really... it's more of an account takeover then anything else. So body snatching vs stalking, I'd say.
So identity theft then.
Re: "Noob" demotivational poster
I do have access to the database anyway O_o;;
Re: "Noob" demotivational poster
I was here! bleh... what is this thread about? :O